Page 1 of 1

a question on @DISAGGREGATE

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:26 am
by hardmann
Dear Tom:

I want to disaggreate and decompose the quarterly real GDP into monthly trend and cycle components. Therefore, I should deeply understand the detail of @DISAGGREGATE procedure. I begin with the log-linear the option, e.g. MODEL=LOGLIN , and without related series, e.g. n=%eqnsize(xvar) =0, factor=3. In such setting, I can focous on my problem. I do not understand the complicated usage of instruction FRML as follow

if model==2 {
...
if n>0 { ..... }
else {
frml cf = lc=lcf,cv=%zeros(ndlm,1),%do(i,1,factor,%(cv(i)=mx(i)=lc(i)*exp(xstate0(t)(i)))),cv
frml ydistf = exp(xstate0(t)(1))
}
frml yf = %if(.not.observed,%na, %(yadj=y+%dot(cf(t),xstate0(t)),%do(i,1,factor,yadj=yadj-mx(i)),yadj))
}

I learned about Chapter 7 "Interpolation and Distribution" of the state space 2ed e-course, and learned about the principle and application of the extended Kalman filter to linearize the log-linear constraints. I do not understan the first and third instrcution FRML.
Especial, I do not know the usage of equal signs in succession, such as " = lc=lcf " , " %(cv(i)=mx(i)=lc(i)*exp(xstate0(t)(i))) "" .
In addition to, usage of %()function and cv,mx.

Please Tom give the details of usage of these function and instruction.

Best Regard
Hardmann

Re: a question on @DISAGGREGATE

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:11 pm
by hardmann
Dear Tom:

Another question. Due to the type of XSTATE0 is series, the type of XV is rather vector than series. Why? In addtion ,GSET should set series of arrays, I guess the type of XV should be series[vetctor] alikewise of XSTATE0.

Code: Select all

   gset xstate0 startl endl = xv=%zeros(n+ndlm,1), $
 lc=lcf,%do(i,1,factor,xv(i)=%if(lc(i)==0,0.0,log(y*lc(i)))),xv
Best Regard
Hardmann

Re: a question on @DISAGGREGATE

Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 11:45 am
by TomDoan
The measurement equation has to be linearized around the current expansion point for the state vector, and the state vector has a variable number of states (depends upon the ratio of frequencies, and may also depend upon the noise model). The "mu" for the linearized state space model consists of the function evaluated at the expansion point minus the f'(x0)x0 which is a dot product of two vectors---the individual elements of that are the MX. (This was written to be usable on an earlier version of RATS, so there is no "MU" option used---instead of y=mu+..., it gets transformed to y-mu=...) The MX and CX are VECTORS because they are indexed by the number of states, not by time.

Re: a question on @DISAGGREGATE

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:47 am
by hardmann
Dear Tom:

Thanks. I eventually figured it out under your suggestion.

hardmann