Examples / CAUSAL.RPF |
CAUSAL.RPF is an example of various forms of Granger causality tests. This does a test for FM1 (log of nominal money) Granger causing GDPH (log of real GDP).
Note that the significance level of the Granger test in this is questionable because the two series are likely to have unit roots. If we take the results as given, we would conclude that nominal money does not cause real GDP at conventional significance levels. Alternatively, we would conclude that GDP is exogenous in its relationship with nominal money.
The final form of the test (Geweke-Meese-Dent) does not have the same problem with non-standard asymptotics. Note that, like the Sims test, this involves running a regression with FM1 as the dependent variable, not GDPH as is done in the Granger test.
The example GRANGERBOOTSTRAP.RPF does a bootstrap calculation of the Granger test on the same pair of series, using the bootstrap to approximate the actual distribution of the Granger test given the unit root behavior of the series.
Full Program
cal(m) 1959:1
allocate 2006:4
open data haversample.rat
data(format=rats) / gdph fm1
log gdph
log fm1
*
* Granger test
*
linreg gdph
# constant gdph{1 to 8} fm1{1 to 8}
exclude(title="Granger Causality Test")
# fm1{1 to 8}
*
* Sims' test
*
set filtm1 = fm1-1.50*fm1{1}+.5625*fm1{2}
set filtgdp = gdph-1.50*gdph{1}+.5625*gdph{2}
*
linreg filtm1
# constant filtgdp{-4 to 8}
exclude(title="Sims Causality Test")
# filtgdp{-4 to -1}
*
* Geweke-Meese-Dent variation
*
linreg fm1
# constant gdph{-4 to 8} fm1{1 to 8}
exclude(title="Geweke-Meese-Dent Causality Test")
# gdph{-4 to -1}
Output
Linear Regression - Estimation by Least Squares
Dependent Variable GDPH
Monthly Data From 1959:09 To 2006:04
Usable Observations 560
Degrees of Freedom 543
Centered R^2 0.9998727
R-Bar^2 0.9998690
Uncentered R^2 0.9999997
Mean of Dependent Variable 8.6164000918
Std Error of Dependent Variable 0.4292900688
Standard Error of Estimate 0.0049143190
Sum of Squared Residuals 0.0131137386
Regression F(16,543) 266570.1573
Significance Level of F 0.0000000
Log Likelihood 2190.7633
Durbin-Watson Statistic 2.0025
Variable Coeff Std Error T-Stat Signif
************************************************************************************
1. Constant 0.023142815 0.014229033 1.62645 0.10443405
2. GDPH{1} 0.940383062 0.042858514 21.94157 0.00000000
3. GDPH{2} -0.000883539 0.057097152 -0.01547 0.98765947
4. GDPH{3} 0.407260257 0.054792388 7.43279 0.00000000
5. GDPH{4} -0.396927291 0.057617485 -6.88901 0.00000000
6. GDPH{5} -0.027798562 0.057349379 -0.48472 0.62806833
7. GDPH{6} 0.339090345 0.054252004 6.25028 0.00000000
8. GDPH{7} -0.304312283 0.056174589 -5.41726 0.00000009
9. GDPH{8} 0.039326930 0.041986340 0.93666 0.34934981
10. FM1{1} 0.016799145 0.041821282 0.40169 0.68807105
11. FM1{2} -0.027559411 0.064160473 -0.42954 0.66770156
12. FM1{3} -0.018693171 0.064310750 -0.29067 0.77141511
13. FM1{4} 0.103736453 0.064374031 1.61146 0.10765963
14. FM1{5} 0.028629003 0.064466030 0.44409 0.65715126
15. FM1{6} -0.137395564 0.064439150 -2.13218 0.03344054
16. FM1{7} -0.002644040 0.064632703 -0.04091 0.96738372
17. FM1{8} 0.039022044 0.042078339 0.92737 0.35414826
Granger Causality Test
Null Hypothesis : The Following Coefficients Are Zero
FM1 Lag(s) 1 to 8
F(8,543)= 1.63750 with Significance Level 0.11131014
Linear Regression - Estimation by Least Squares
Dependent Variable FILTM1
Monthly Data From 1959:11 To 2005:12
Usable Observations 554
Degrees of Freedom 540
Centered R^2 0.9558178
R-Bar^2 0.9547541
Uncentered R^2 0.9993122
Mean of Dependent Variable 0.3853800897
Std Error of Dependent Variable 0.0485059223
Standard Error of Estimate 0.0103177337
Sum of Squared Residuals 0.0574860390
Regression F(13,540) 898.6235
Significance Level of F 0.0000000
Log Likelihood 1754.9337
Durbin-Watson Statistic 0.7176
Variable Coeff Std Error T-Stat Signif
************************************************************************************
1. Constant -0.581372238 0.009019101 -64.46011 0.00000000
2. FILTGDP{-4} 0.125413682 0.091201555 1.37513 0.16966244
3. FILTGDP{-3} 0.112189547 0.103163939 1.08749 0.27730634
4. FILTGDP{-2} 0.196587384 0.104764051 1.87648 0.06112881
5. FILTGDP{-1} 0.195018167 0.107524845 1.81370 0.07027835
6. FILTGDP 0.234905857 0.108860259 2.15787 0.03137846
7. FILTGDP{1} 0.275649729 0.108964934 2.52971 0.01169896
8. FILTGDP{2} 0.116856390 0.112924051 1.03482 0.30121484
9. FILTGDP{3} 0.105792803 0.109930185 0.96236 0.33629775
10. FILTGDP{4} 0.053727907 0.108458102 0.49538 0.62053387
11. FILTGDP{5} 0.114008575 0.106827718 1.06722 0.28634982
12. FILTGDP{6} 0.131318262 0.104100584 1.26146 0.20768941
13. FILTGDP{7} 0.074273852 0.100585267 0.73842 0.46058200
14. FILTGDP{8} 0.057120440 0.088633089 0.64446 0.51955114
Sims Causality Test
Null Hypothesis : The Following Coefficients Are Zero
FILTGDP Lag(s) -4 to -1
F(4,540)= 1.78755 with Significance Level 0.12986402
Linear Regression - Estimation by Least Squares
Dependent Variable FM1
Monthly Data From 1959:09 To 2005:12
Usable Observations 556
Degrees of Freedom 534
Centered R^2 0.9999594
R-Bar^2 0.9999578
Uncentered R^2 0.9999994
Mean of Dependent Variable 6.1370722489
Std Error of Dependent Variable 0.7756055205
Standard Error of Estimate 0.0050407053
Sum of Squared Residuals 0.0135682513
Regression F(21,534) 625684.2182
Significance Level of F 0.0000000
Log Likelihood 2163.6501
Durbin-Watson Statistic 1.9982
Variable Coeff Std Error T-Stat Signif
************************************************************************************
1. Constant -0.015015555 0.014971093 -1.00297 0.31632968
2. GDPH{-4} 0.084123624 0.044523703 1.88941 0.05937810
3. GDPH{-3} -0.095035516 0.061129670 -1.55465 0.12062082
4. GDPH{-2} 0.010699385 0.061270683 0.17462 0.86144059
5. GDPH{-1} -0.011062650 0.062939675 -0.17577 0.86054448
6. GDPH 0.045536137 0.064328904 0.70786 0.47933835
7. GDPH{1} 0.039474558 0.064352234 0.61341 0.53986385
8. GDPH{2} -0.155906448 0.064320491 -2.42390 0.01568594
9. GDPH{3} 0.024715876 0.064311025 0.38432 0.70089585
10. GDPH{4} -0.007087366 0.064334004 -0.11017 0.91231977
11. GDPH{5} 0.048282602 0.062083878 0.77770 0.43709058
12. GDPH{6} 0.009546844 0.059691579 0.15994 0.87299181
13. GDPH{7} -0.042916760 0.059707020 -0.71879 0.47258523
14. GDPH{8} 0.053055158 0.043409673 1.22220 0.22217246
15. FM1{1} 1.163199959 0.043650341 26.64813 0.00000000
16. FM1{2} -0.078920098 0.066649342 -1.18411 0.23689664
17. FM1{3} 0.064304204 0.066613062 0.96534 0.33481187
18. FM1{4} -0.112706126 0.066605101 -1.69215 0.09119986
19. FM1{5} 0.029444034 0.066802477 0.44076 0.65956325
20. FM1{6} 0.091683781 0.067209930 1.36414 0.17309804
21. FM1{7} -0.130779585 0.067643415 -1.93337 0.05371917
22. FM1{8} -0.028327670 0.043940604 -0.64468 0.51941080
Geweke-Meese-Dent Causality Test
Null Hypothesis : The Following Coefficients Are Zero
GDPH Lag(s) -4 to -1
F(4,534)= 0.95652 with Significance Level 0.43097395
Copyright © 2025 Thomas A. Doan