MS-ARIMA
Re: MS-ARIMA
Hi Tom,
Is there any code available for calculating t-ratios by using delta method is using MLE?
Is there any code available for calculating t-ratios by using delta method is using MLE?
Re: MS-ARIMA
SUMMARIZE (second form) does that. (BTW, delta method is in the manual index).
Re: MS-ARIMA
Hi tom, Thank you for your quick reply. I tried summarize instruction to calculate the t-test for P11 and P22 which are the functions of theta1 and theta2 from my estimation. However, I got error message like this all the time.TomDoan wrote:SUMMARIZE (second form) does that. (BTW, delta method is in the manual index).
Code: Select all
## OP3 This Instruction Does Not Have An Option PAR
>>>>summarize(parmset=<<<<. - Attachments
-
- arma43(AW-GDP).RPF
- (4.87 KiB) Downloaded 1216 times
Re: MS-ARIMA
PARMSET is a relatively new option (added with 8.2).
Re: MS-ARIMA
Thanks for the quick reply. I am using rats8.0. Does it mean I can not use the summarize instruction here? Is there another instruction I can use to calculate the t-ratio for P11 and P22?TomDoan wrote:PARMSET is a relatively new option.
Re: MS-ARIMA
You should ask your department to get the software updated. However, with 8.0 you can do the same thing, but you have to use expressions with the clumsier %beta(position) to reference parameters.
Re: MS-ARIMA
Thank you for the quick replyTomDoan wrote:You should ask your department to get the software updated. However, with 8.0 you can do the same thing, but you have to use expressions with the clumsier %beta(position) to reference parameters.
Re: MS-ARIMA
Hi Tom. I would like to get the statistical inference on Pii, exp(theta), by using simulation method. What instruction should I use? Is there any example I can take a look at? Many ThanksTomDoan wrote:SUMMARIZE (second form) does that. (BTW, delta method is in the manual index).
Re: MS-ARIMA
"Instruction"? Gibbs sampling for a model like that is probably 100 lines of code. You would have to adapt the Kim-Nelson example to the ARMA model (which would require some form of Metropolis sampling) and time-varying transition probabilities (which would require sampling a logit model). Given that you're doing just two regimes, it would be simpler to switch to a probit-style function for the transition probabilities rather than a logit. The two should give very similar results, but Gibbs sampling is much simpler for a probit than a logit. (The logit is simpler to handle for the TVTP if you have three or more regimes).
Re: MS-ARIMA
Hi Tom. Thank you for your detailed explanation. In addition to the Gibbs sampling and delta method, is there any other method I could use to generate the statistical inference on p=exp(theta)/(1+exp(theta)) given theta is the estimate from the model?TomDoan wrote:"Instruction"? Gibbs sampling for a model like that is probably 100 lines of code. You would have to adapt the Kim-Nelson example to the ARMA model (which would require some form of Metropolis sampling) and time-varying transition probabilities (which would require sampling a logit model). Given that you're doing just two regimes, it would be simpler to switch to a probit-style function for the transition probabilities rather than a logit. The two should give very similar results, but Gibbs sampling is much simpler for a probit than a logit. (The logit is simpler to handle for the TVTP if you have three or more regimes).
Re: MS-ARIMA
Not really. I don't see bootstrapping as an option with a model like this.
Re: MS-ARIMA
Dear Tom, thank you for the reply. The examples in the Kim and Nelson's book (state-space model with regime switching) report the estimated probabilities (p and q), instead of the thetas. Your codes for the examples give us the estimated thetas only. Therefore, I am wondering how I can get the estimated probabilities and their statistical inferences as ones reported in the book. One way I know is to apply the delta method, is there any other method for obtaining the estimated probabilities and their statistical inferences. Thank you in advanceTomDoan wrote:Not really. I don't see bootstrapping as an option with a model like this.
Re: MS-ARIMA
Didn't I just answer that? What's wrong with the delta method?
Re: MS-ARIMA
Thank you for the answer. There is nothing wrong with the delta method. I just would like to know why the results calculated from the delta method are so different from the ones reported in the text book.TomDoan wrote:Didn't I just answer that? What's wrong with the delta method?
Re: MS-ARIMA
Could you cite a specific example?