BoxJenk

Econometrics questions and discussions
ivory4
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:16 pm

BoxJenk

Unread post by ivory4 »

After using Boxjen to estimate ARIMA(p,1,q), I DISPLAY the equation defined in the model. Notice the constant is different from estimate while the coefficients are the same.
Why?

How does @armadlm transform ARIMA into statespace form? I would like to use drawn parameters for adlm and fdlm to replace those generated by @armadlm(a=adlm,f=fdlm) equation
TomDoan
Posts: 7814
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:36 pm

Re: BoxJen

Unread post by TomDoan »

ivory4 wrote:After using Boxjenk to estimate ARIMA(p,1,q), I DISPLAY the equation defined in the model. Notice the constant is different from estimate while the coefficients are the same. Why?
That's explained in the description of BOXJENK. BOXJENK estimates the model in a form where the CONSTANT is the mean of the process, not the intercept in the reduced form needed in the equation form.
ivory4 wrote:How does @armadlm transform ARIMA into statespace form? I would like to use drawn parameters for adlm and fdlm to replace those generated by @armadlm(a=adlm,f=fdlm) equation
That's explained in quite a bit of detail in the comments in the procedure file. I would just reset the coefficients for the ARMA equation (use %eqnsetcoeffs) and apply ARMADLM to the result; nothing that you would do would be any different.
Post Reply