Willinger, Taqqu, Teverovsky(1999)
Willinger, Taqqu, Teverovsky(1999)
This is a replication file for Willinger, Taqqu and Teverovsky(1999), "Stock Market Prices and Long-Range Dependence", Finance and Stochastics, vol 3, pp 1-13. This includes use of the @RSStatistic and @Hurst procedures and estimation of an ARFIMA model.
Re: Willinger, Taqqu, Teverovsky(1999)
Dear Tom,
I have run the code. but the values of H and graphs turn out to be very different. Even graphs do not look like the paper. I attach the output and one sample graph generated by the new code for your reference. Only Fig 1(a)- Trace of EW and Fig 2(b)-equally weighed index log-log plot match with the paper. Previous codes seem to be given better values of H. Value of MA coefficients turn out to be positive 0.40 which was negative -0.40 in the paper.
Looking forward for your reply,
With regards,
Prashant
I have run the code. but the values of H and graphs turn out to be very different. Even graphs do not look like the paper. I attach the output and one sample graph generated by the new code for your reference. Only Fig 1(a)- Trace of EW and Fig 2(b)-equally weighed index log-log plot match with the paper. Previous codes seem to be given better values of H. Value of MA coefficients turn out to be positive 0.40 which was negative -0.40 in the paper.
Looking forward for your reply,
With regards,
Prashant
- Attachments
-
- graph1.RGF
- (53.31 KiB) Downloaded 879 times
-
- output.RPF
- (13.45 KiB) Downloaded 881 times
Re: Willinger, Taqqu, Teverovsky(1999)
The signs of MA coefficients depend upon the parameterization. RATS uses (1+thetaL)u_t while some software uses (1-thetaL)u_t which will give exactly the same magnitude but opposite signs.
Re: Willinger, Taqqu, Teverovsky(1999)
I fixed an error with that revised @HURST. Download the newest one.prashantj wrote:Dear Tom,
I have run the code. but the values of H and graphs turn out to be very different. Even graphs do not look like the paper. I attach the output and one sample graph generated by the new code for your reference. Only Fig 1(a)- Trace of EW and Fig 2(b)-equally weighed index log-log plot match with the paper. Previous codes seem to be given better values of H. Value of MA coefficients turn out to be positive 0.40 which was negative -0.40 in the paper.
Looking forward for your reply,
With regards,
Prashant