Researchers dont discuss "magnitude of volatilityspillover"
-
curiousresearcher
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun May 19, 2019 9:56 pm
Researchers dont discuss "magnitude of volatilityspillover"
Hi Tom,
Hope you are doing well!
I have a query.
In most of the BEKK-GARCH papers, it has been observed that the magnitude of volatility spillover is not discussed much (i.e. +2.45 or -2.45 coeffecients of cross arch or garch effect). Generally its only mentioned VS is significant or non significant.
What is the rationale behind this ?
Hope you are doing well!
I have a query.
In most of the BEKK-GARCH papers, it has been observed that the magnitude of volatility spillover is not discussed much (i.e. +2.45 or -2.45 coeffecients of cross arch or garch effect). Generally its only mentioned VS is significant or non significant.
What is the rationale behind this ?
Re: Researchers dont discuss "magnitude of volatilityspillov
That's pretty much the same explanation as in the paragraph beginning with "Another common question..." in the discussion of the BEKK model in the help:
https://estima.com/ratshelp/garchmvrpf. ... utput_BEKK
The coefficients are sensitive to the scales of the variables and the magnitudes of their variances.
https://estima.com/ratshelp/garchmvrpf. ... utput_BEKK
The coefficients are sensitive to the scales of the variables and the magnitudes of their variances.
-
curiousresearcher
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun May 19, 2019 9:56 pm
Re: Researchers dont discuss "magnitude of volatilityspillov
Thank you.TomDoan wrote:That's pretty much the same explanation as in the paragraph beginning with "Another common question..." in the discussion of the BEKK model in the help:
https://estima.com/ratshelp/garchmvrpf. ... utput_BEKK
The coefficients are sensitive to the scales of the variables and the magnitudes of their variances.